Archive for March, 2008

The Lion, The Gazelle and The Speeding Ticket.

There is a speed trap near where I live in Indiana and it annoys me every time I drive by it and see someone pulled over. I’ve been considering this article for six months now because of my annoyance with speed traps. What better time to write this article than two hours after receiving a speeding ticket. This is my first ticket in 13 years. The last ticket I received was on a highway late at night the day my Grandmother died and there wasn’t a car within sight of me.

Neither 13 years ago nor today was I driving in a reckless manner, nor was I driving in a way that endangered other drivers’ lives. In today’s case I was driving behind a couple of cars at a slower speed. The tickets issued (13 years ago and today) were not the product of an officer protecting the lives of a tax payer. The tickets were a way for the city to generate revenue, in my opinion. Is that why we have police officers? The officers are paid from our tax money. The officers pull us over to generate revenue. Why do we have officers generating revenue for a job in which they are already paid? It’s like he’s being paid by me to fine me.

Sidebar: I’m only talking about when officers are instructed to ticket people (speed traps) for money, which is not what they were hired for. I’m not talking about an officer risking his life or protecting mine, which is what they’re hired for.

But can you blame the officer? I don’t really think we can. As an employee (the officer) of an agency he doesn’t own, he can neither make rules or change them. For the most part, he simply follows the rules that have been laid out before him. He and I are alike in the sense that we are working to feed our families. I would think to an officer this would be one part of the job they would find most embarrassing.

The entire incident:
It was noon and I had just left Indian Hills neighborhood in Louisville, KY after doing a support job. Instead of taking a left and heading towards the highway (North East) I thought I would roll down my window and head right on Brownsboro Rd. (South West) towards Zorn Ave. and get a little fresh air because it’s 65 degrees and a very nice, sunny day. Less than a quarter mile from Indian Hills I was listening to a podcast and traveling behind a grey van and a black Acura when all of the sudden the Acura slowed down abruptly, I don’t remember having to even tap my brakes since I was driving slower and slightly further behind them. After the Acura slowed down I saw a police car parked in the right emergency lane. His car was facing the same direction we were traveling as was the police officer. After all three of us passed the parked police car, he turned his lights on, pulled out right behind me and followed me for about a half block. As he got closer I looked in my review mirror and pointed at myself to see if he wanted me to pull over or get out of the way. His hand gesture indicated he wanted me to pull over, which actually surprised me. I pulled over between a couple mailboxes and put my car in park. My window was already down. As the officer approached my window I asked, “How can I help you?” He said, “May I see your license please?” I said, “Yes.” I then removed it from my wallet and handed it to him. He proceeded to ask, “Is the address on your license correct?” I said, “Yes.” The officer asked, “Do you know what the speed limit is?” I said, “No, I don’t normally go this way.” He said, “You were doing 51 in a 35.” I didn’t respond (it’s unlikely that he actually targeted my car at 51 since I didn’t even see his car until after the Acura slowed down. Both the van and the Acura blocked my view of the police car. He said, “I’ll be right back.” I said, “OK.” After about 4 or 5 minutes he returned with my license and a piece of paper. I put my license away and looked at the paper. It was a Uniform Citation. I quickly glanced and saw $161. I said to the officer, “Does that say $161?” He said, “Let me see, yes it does.” I replied, “I barely made more than that to come over here.” He replied “Then it wasn’t worth it.” He then said, “Thank you.” and turned and walked away. As he pulled away from me he did a U-turn; I would assume to return to his position in the emergency lane.

By no means am I saying the officer is lying. I don’t know if the officer radared the van or the Acura that were in front of me. However, it’s obvious to me that he is mistaken and he did not witness or radar me at any speed.

I kind of picture the whole situation like the officer was The Lion and I was The Gazelle at the back of the herd.

I will be reporting to court at said date. The only thing on my mind will be “Not Guilty.” I may have some diagrams as well.

These are some illustrations I’ll taking with me to show that the officer would not have been able to get a read off my car. I’ve done my homework, I hope the judge will see that.

Apple TV and external hard drives

I look forward to owning an Apple TV. First I’m going to have to get a widescreen TV which is the only kind they work with. They also work with 480p TVs but what’s the point in that?

I don’t currently own an Apple TV but I do own an Xbox 360. And as it turns out the Xbox is one hell of a good video device. I have a 500GB external USB hard drive formatted as FAT32. It must be FAT32 for you to be able to connect it to your Xbox 360. Once connected to your Xbox 360 over USB you can watch many video types. I’ve been using Handbrake to convert my DVD movies to M4V video files. I’m using Handbrake’s Apple TV Take 2 settings with 2-Pass. Then I transfer the video files to the Movie folder on the external hard drive.

I can easily select the hard drive from the Xbox 360 menu and play any movie or TV Show (Firefly) I have on it. And they look fantastic. You can also put image files on the drive and view them from the Xbox. I plan on getting a PS3 (maybe) by the end of this or beginning of next. The PS3 will also read this same drive connected over USB and play the same video files or view image files.

The Apple TV has been out for a year now and it’s one USB port currently serves no purpose. When I get an Apple TV I want to be able to connect my pre-existing 500GB external USB hard drive to it. And have it play the movie files I’ve already encoded. I am making sure to select Apple TV specific settings.

Why does it matter. Because I really like the idea of all my movies accessible from one location. This is taking time and effort to setup. It would be nice not to lose the effort when it comes to the Apple TV. If the Apple TV never supports external storage, the drive will remain connected to the Xbox 360 and will continue to be my main source for video content. I already rent more movies from Xbox Live than iTunes or TiVo.

“Apple, by the time I get an Apple TV could you enable external storage through the USB port? And make sure it can read FAT32 so I don’t have to reformat and transfer all of my video files.”

The iTunes Station, WAPL The Apple

In a previous article of mine I describe a new type of subscription service. It was more of a try before you buy solution.

I believe that Apple can have a plan to start a subscription based service for music. But unlike all of the comments about how people don’t want to rent music, this is more like XM Radio. Imagine paying a small monthly fee to Apple in exchange for unlimited listening to many channels of music. I don’t think the service will work if Apple doesn’t automatically make channels get music for their particular genre. Nearly identical to the way that XM has an 80’s channel. It would need to be similar to a radio station.

Apple would need to differentiate between renting music and a music station with many different channels. All songs are purchasable, the channels only play songs that you can buy. Unlike radio where you listen to what they want to play, with The iTunes Station you pick the channels you want to listen to and you may even have options to filter it specifically to your tastes. For instance, I like 80’s music, but only from about 84-89.

Apple probably already had something like this in mind and the newest iPods and iPhone are fully capable of playing music channels from The iTunes Station.

I would certainly consider trying it to see or hear rather some new music. Since I listen to mostly my own music instead a radio stations I’m sure I miss out on songs I would buy.

You can take this a step further and Apple could provide The iTunes Station for free with advertisements between songs just like a regular radio station. They could also provide this service over the internet as an internet radio station. There would be a ticker tape that could be clicked on taking you to the iTunes track in the iTunes Store for purchasing. How would they benefit? They would focus on playing music you don’t already own (when local to your machine). This way if you hear something you want to buy, click a Buy button while the song is playing from The iTunes Station and you own it. There are several models that could be used for this type of service, I describe just two of them.

The key for Apple is to remove the perception of renting music. Presenting it as a radio station (WAPL The Apple) will accomplish that.

Apple Time Capsule

I have a long and varied relationship with routers. I have always sold the model I have for the model I want. This includes my first router which wasn’t wireless. I’ve gone through all the brands and price ranges. I have sold my current Apple Airport Extreme Gigabit to make way for my new Apple Time Capsule 1TB. Apple’s Time Capsule is in fact an Airport Extreme with a built-in hard drive. The purpose of this device is for backups.

I had originally bought my Airport Extreme with the idea that I would be able to connect a HD to it and use Time Machine to backup. Unfortunately that feature didn’t make it into Time Machine or an Airport Extreme update, leaving myself and few others slightly disappointed. I’m not going to claim to know why it didn’t make it into the feature set. No big deal, I’ve sold the Airport Extreme and have what I want, wireless backups. Time Capsule is that solution.

I’ve had it for several days now and it appears to work effortlessly. I could have connected my computer directly to the Time Capsule so my first backup would have run very fast but I wanted to see how well it would do wirelessly. My MacBook doesn’t have 802.11N so I was backing up over 802.11G. I have approximately 160GB of data to backup. My wife has a MacBook with 802.11N and she had 80GB of data to backup. If you option-click the Airport icon in your Menu Bar you will see your Transmit Rate. Mine was 54 while Karen’s was 130. Karen’s computer took 8 hours to do it’s initial backup of 80GB. My computer took 36 hours to do it’s initial backup of 160GB.

The hardest part was not taking my computer anywhere for a whole day while it backed up. Now that the backups are done, incremental backups happen without me even noticing. Karen’s Transmit Rate would have been 300 if I didn’t have 802.11B/G items connected to the Time Capsule. Even at a reduced rate of 130, her MacBook was backing up more than twice as fast as mine.

The Apple Time Capsule works exactly the same way the Apple Airport Extreme with a hard drive connected does, except you can’t use Time Machine with the Airport Extreme to backup. That so far is the one feature that makes it better. And that one feature works very well.

My recommendation is to go with the Time Capsule for your wireless Time Machine backups. I went with the Time Capsule 1TB model but there is also the Time Capsule 500GB model if you don’t need the extra space.

UPDATE 03-19-2008: It appears as though several updates released today by Apple brings the aforementioned backup feature to Airport Extreme. That means you can use an Airport Extreme with a connected USB hard drive to backup your computer with Time Machine. Thanks for the updates Apple.

Firefly: Our Mrs. Reynolds

Nathan Fillion as Malcolm Reynolds

“Someone ever tries to kill you, you try to kill em’ right back.”